Today at 01:03
Roughly 80% of Americans — including Trump voters — support aid to Ukraine and holding Russia accountable, which starkly contrasts with proposals for territorial concessions.
Across the United States, public opinion continues to show robust, cross-party support for Ukraine as the war persists. Polling by the Vandenberg Coalition reveals consistently high approval for assistance to Kyiv among Americans, including a majority of Republican voters, underscoring broad resistance to any form of rewarding Russian aggression. In Europe, similar attitudes are reflected in a joint statement by 20 heads of foreign affairs committees, who emphasize that peace cannot be achieved at the price of concessions to Moscow. Together, these trends form the basis for renewed transatlantic unity around a just settlement.
Read more in the article by Danylo Yershov, a political scientist specializing in international relations, junior expert at the United Ukraine Think Tank.
Firstly, political scientist explains that American support is grounded in the recognition that the war affects not only European security but also global stability, with U.S. interests directly tied to the resilience of its allies. According to the Vandenberg Coalition’s August 2025 survey, 80% of Americans endorse providing security guarantees to Ukraine, indicating a growing consensus across political and social groups. This is not a fleeting trend but rather a reflection of the belief that a strong Ukraine contributes to a broader strategy of “peace through strength,” a concept deeply embedded in American political culture and its tradition of opposing aggression.
Secondly, Yershov emphasizes that for many Republican voters, the conflict in Ukraine has become a test of U.S. leadership. Territorial compromises are seen as strategic weakness that could embolden rivals such as China or Iran. Polling shows that 86% of Trump supporters view Russia as a threat to the United States, while 76% back expanded sanctions on Russian oil. Support for Ukraine — with 58–62% endorsing assistance, including 26–31% in favor of military aid — increasingly aligns with an “America First” logic, in which investing in allies is understood as a cost-effective means of strengthening long-term American security. These attitudes are reinforced by the belief that peace without accountability will not be sustainable.
Thirdly, the expert argues that even within the Republican electorate, a clear majority sees assistance to Ukraine as a preventive investment that helps avert wider conflicts. For example, 83% of Trump voters support fulfilling U.S. commitments to NATO, and overall public support for the alliance remains stable at 72–80%, depending on the month. Concerns about the tightening strategic partnership among Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea—expressed by 88% of respondents—further reinforce this outlook. As a result, measures such as sanctions and arms transfers (including 72% support for Tomahawk sales) are increasingly viewed not as escalatory steps but as essential tools of deterrence intended to secure peace on terms that uphold democratic norms.
All in all, political scientist concludes: The broad and durable American support for Ukraine, especially among Republicans, reflects a widespread understanding that concessions to Putin will neither end the war nor reduce future risks. When combined with Europe’s position, this sentiment strengthens the potential for a coordinated transatlantic approach centered on a just resolution in which international law prevails over coercion by an aggressor state. This strong domestic backing for a principled peace gives reason to believe that these values will shape future negotiations and influence the trajectory of global security.
Read the full article by Danylo Yershov on The Gaze: Broad Support for Ukraine Among Americans: Why Even Republicans Are Against Concessions to Putin
Read also: Why Donald Trump is Interested in a Quick, Not Quality, Completion of the War in Ukraine
