Today at 16:02
Russian leader Vladimir Putin used his October 2 speech at the Valdai Discussion Club to continue threatening Europe as part of a broader information campaign aimed at deterring the West from responding to Russia’s aggressive actions, according to a new report by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).
Putin claimed that Russia is “closely monitoring the militarization of Europe” and warned that Moscow’s response to such efforts “will not be delayed.” He added that Russia is evaluating whether European defense initiatives are “just words” or if Russia should take “countermeasures,” which, he threatened, “will be very convincing.”
He further asserted that Russia “never initiated military confrontation,” while suggesting that any clash with Moscow “would ultimately end badly for the provocateur.” At the same time, Putin dismissed warnings about Russian aggression as “nonsense” and attempts to “stir up hysteria” in Europe, calling on European states to “calm down” and focus on their domestic issues.
“Putin is trying to dissuade European NATO members from strengthening their defenses and providing military aid to Ukraine,” ISW analysts noted, “claiming that Russia only poses a threat to Europe insofar as Europe resists Putin’s objectives.”
The think tank stressed that these remarks come in the context of recent Russian drone incursions into European airspace, flights of Russian military aircraft over NATO territory, and hybrid sabotage operations against NATO facilities.
ISW assessed that Moscow is seeking to “sow division and fear in Europe,” pointing in particular to operations in Poland, Germany, and Lithuania. Analysts added that the Valdai platform remains a long-term tool for the Kremlin to shape Western policy narratives in its favor.
Putin also used his speech to warn the United States against supplying Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, indirectly threatening Washington.
He described Tomahawks as “powerful” and “threatening,” claiming that Ukraine could not operate them without “direct involvement of U.S. personnel” and warning that their deployment would mark “a new stage of escalation.” At the same time, he tried to downplay their importance, calling them “not exactly modern” and insisting that supplying them “would not change the balance of power on the battlefield.”
“ISW continues to assess that Ukraine has an operational need to strike critical Russian military infrastructure deep in the rear,” the report emphasized.
The analysts concluded that Putin’s Valdai address was designed to ensure that his messaging reached a wide audience and contributed to Russia’s broader goal: convincing the West not to support Ukraine and not to strengthen its defenses against Russia.
