{"id":1262058,"date":"2025-11-30T17:12:42","date_gmt":"2025-11-30T15:12:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uatv.ua\/?p=1262058"},"modified":"2025-11-30T17:12:47","modified_gmt":"2025-11-30T15:12:47","slug":"anna-danylchuk-kremlin-pushes-trump-deal-for-ukraine-capitulation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uatv.ua\/en\/anna-danylchuk-kremlin-pushes-trump-deal-for-ukraine-capitulation\/","title":{"rendered":"Anna Danylchuk: Kremlin PUSHES Trump deal for UKRAINE CAPITULATION\u200b"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Journalist and YouTube blogger Anna Danylchuk<\/strong> in UATV studio analyzes explosive leak exposing Kremlin’s direct role in crafting so-called “peace plan” presented to Trump administration. This plan demands Ukraine’s capitulation without any Russian concessions.\u200b <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In conversation<\/a> with host Henry Keen, they explore how scandal impacts White House trust, why Europe won’t accept deal behind Kyiv’s back, and signs of internal rifts in Trump team. Also discussed: why sanctions scare Kremlin, Congress role in Ukraine support, and why NATO’s future depends on Ukraine’s reliability.\u200b<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Witkoff\u2019s leaked conversations with the Kremlin. Let\u2019s draw a historical parallel and talk about the consequences for the United States, for Ukraine, and for trust. First of all \u2014 how do you think this could even happen in the first place?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 That\u2019s a really interesting question. And what surprises me is the reaction in the United States. Fifty years ago, this would have been a massive geopolitical scandal \u2014 people fired, real investigations. And now? Nothing. It\u2019s treated like a typical business deal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the positive side, at least now we have proof that the 28 points of the so-called \u201cpeace plan\u201d \u2014 in reality, a capitulation plan \u2014 were composed in the Kremlin<\/em>. And regarding who leaked it: I personally don’t think it was the Russians. This actually ruins one of their channels of influence and manipulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Maybe it was some U.S. intelligence service \u2014 that would be great. Or the British, or the Polish. I\u2019m proud that many people in the White House assumed this was a Ukrainian intelligence operation. Maybe the myth of Ukrainian capabilities is stronger than we think.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 If we were that powerful, why not end Russia\u2019s influence once and for all? But seriously \u2014 about diplomacy behind Kyiv\u2019s back: why won\u2019t Ukraine and Europe allow such decisions? Because Russia is offering a \u201cpeace plan\u201d but rejecting concessions, and the plan itself is just a wish list of things they failed to achieve in four years of war.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Exactly. And what surprises me is that in this document they tried to trick the world with, there is not a single<\/em> point involving concessions from the Russian side. Not one uncomfortable or unpleasant clause for the Kremlin. If I wanted to trick someone, I\u2019d at least try to balance the document to look realistic. But no \u2014 they simply packaged the Kremlin\u2019s wishlist and sent it through Witkov.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why won\u2019t European leaders and Ukraine accept it? Because everyone is worried watching the unpredictable movements in the White House. It undermines decades of trust between Europe and North America. And from my communication with many people, especially in Europe, they now understand: this is not about Ukraine or its territory \u2014 it\u2019s about the security and independence of Europe and NATO itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

And more and more people realize: Ukraine is not a burden. Ukraine is an asset \u2014 a country that knows how to fight a 21st-century war, often better than NATO.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Absolutely. Some even say it\u2019s time for Ukraine to decide whether it wants to join a family that seems unable to react in time. As Colonel Grant says, \u201cEurope is not ready.\u201d Anna, do you think all these leaks and the weakness of the U.S. administration could be a sign of a split inside Trump\u2019s team?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Yes, for sure. And honestly, I think there is no real team. Even Trump\u2019s vice-president, JD Vance, called Trump a \u201cHitler\u201d just a few years ago \u2014 now he\u2019s his supporter. Many joined not because of values or vision, but for influence and access to power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We see huge differences between how Trump and Vance want to end the war and how actual Republican voters see it. I was relieved to see 76% of Republican voters view Russia as the aggressor and want it defeated. They don\u2019t want Ukraine abandoned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This public support is one of the main restraints preventing Trump from totally abandoning NATO, the EU, or Ukraine. It will be very hard for him to force Ukrainian capitulation when Americans strongly support Ukraine. And I must thank everyone who calls their senators and congresspeople to stand with Ukraine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Let\u2019s speculate: whoever leaked this \u2014 what might be the motive? Who benefits? Is this just a journalist trying to make money?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 I don\u2019t think so. I think it was a political or intelligence intervention. Trump is emotional, and it\u2019s obvious he wants to work with Russia somehow \u2014 forgetting that Russia\u2019s GDP is smaller than Texas, California, or even Italy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Putin, Ushakov, Dmitriev \u2014 trained manipulators \u2014 can easily trick people like Witkov, who was just a real-estate agent and Trump\u2019s coffee-meeting friend. He knows nothing about Russia or the regions they want Ukraine to abandon. This ignorance helps Russia manipulate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our EU allies understand: it is better to stick with the U.S. long-term. These current problems are temporary. They want to preserve intelligence sharing and defense cooperation. So I think someone leaked this to stop Trump from unknowingly supporting a Kremlin document \u2014 even without reading it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The leak exposed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  • the total unacceptability of the Kremlin\u2019s \u201cplan,\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • the extent of Russian influence inside the White House.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

    It wasn\u2019t for money \u2014 it was necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u2014 What about the consequences of this scandal for Ukraine? Is it good or bad?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u2014 It\u2019s both. Bad \u2014 because it\u2019s betrayal during a great war. Good \u2014 because we have investigations, scandals, accountability. It shows Ukrainian society is fighting corruption. Corruption is everywhere \u2014 U.S., Germany, Ukraine \u2014 you see scandals, investigations, resignations. Only in Russia do you never read about it because corruption is their national sport.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    It\u2019s bad that these people abused funds that could save lives \u2014 but good that they were exposed. We can clean the system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u2014 And about the timing \u2014 is this a good time for such leaks?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u2014 Yes. Everything has changed this year. Many scandals, many leaks, much unprofessional behavior \u2014 not just in the U.S., also in Europe and Ukraine. Everything is intense. But truth is better than comforting lies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    This leak proves Russian influence exists. It proves Russia tried to stop new sanctions. And it shows that sanctions hurt Russia \u2014 economically, militarily, socially. They fear sanctions more than they fear peace.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Now is not<\/em> the time to appease Putin. Now is the time to defeat, demilitarize, and punish Russia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u2014 Do you believe citizens and the Senate can turn the situation toward Ukraine?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u2014 Yes \u2014 and it\u2019s already happening. There\u2019s no real benefit for Americans in cooperating with Russia \u2014 a poor, angry, anti-American country. And Russia\u2019s so-called \u201cfriendship\u201d with China cannot be broken by Trump \u2014 both regimes are deeply anti-American.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Ordinary Americans feel more connected to Ukrainians. They choose to stay informed, support us, contact their representatives. And in a democracy, politicians must listen to the nation. That\u2019s what is happening.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u2014 Last question. What about cooperation, transatlantic unity \u2014 is that shattered?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u2014 No. I believe NATO can return to its strength \u2014 with Ukraine<\/em>. Many soldiers say NATO should join Ukraine, not the other way around. Ukraine knows modern warfare, builds drones, understands defense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n

    EU leaders now understand:
    If Ukraine is sacrificed, Europe is exposed.
    If Russia is rewarded, it will attack the EU and NATO next.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

    Ukraine is not only morally aligned with Europe \u2014 it is strategically indispensable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    This is why proposals that undermine NATO\u2019s sovereignty \u2014 like banning NATO from admitting Ukraine \u2014 are unacceptable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    And thanks to the leaks and the reactions, I hope Russia\u2019s plan is now destroyed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n