{"id":1046946,"date":"2024-11-22T18:01:00","date_gmt":"2024-11-22T16:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uatv.ua\/?p=1046946"},"modified":"2024-11-20T15:55:44","modified_gmt":"2024-11-20T13:55:44","slug":"long-range-restrictions-what-exactly-and-what-is-a-new-range-interview-with-maksym-dzhyhun","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uatv.ua\/en\/long-range-restrictions-what-exactly-and-what-is-a-new-range-interview-with-maksym-dzhyhun\/","title":{"rendered":"Long-range restrictions – what exactly and what is a new range? Interview with Maksym Dzhyhun"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Long-range restrictions – what exactly and what is a new range? Why now? Can they be casted back when Trump returns to power? Our expert Maksym Dzhyhun<\/strong> online will explain you this topics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Long-range restrictions lifted\u2014thank God, that’s good. But which weapons, specifically, and what is the new range?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Yes, as we understand, we now have access to 300-kilometer-range ATACMS systems. This enables Ukraine to send our “love” to Russia on their territory, targeting various military facilities in their regions. This capability enhances our ability to defend our land and is a significant boost, thanks to our American partners. We hope European allies follow suit, although it depends not just on approval but on the availability of these rockets to sustain operations on Russian territory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 You mentioned European allies. Germany has been hesitant. Do you think this will change?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Unfortunately, I don\u2019t see much chance of progress under Chancellor Olaf Scholz. However, Germany\u2019s opposition seems more willing to support Ukraine with various military systems. Next year, Germany will likely elect a new chancellor, and the opposition’s stance on finalizing this war on Ukrainian terms could play a critical role in their campaign. Elections are scheduled for February 23, 2025, and this topic will be pivotal in shaping Germany’s future policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Why was the restriction on long-range weapons lifted now? Was it Biden\u2019s decision, Trump\u2019s influence, or global factors like North Korea?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Over the three years of this war, many initial restrictions by our allies have been gradually lifted\u2014starting with tanks, then F-16s. These decisions were often tied to efforts to negotiate or de-escalate with Russia, but they proved ineffective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This latest decision likely came after several escalatory actions by Russia, including attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure and evidence of North Korean troops in Russian-occupied territories, like Kursk oblast. These events, combined with renewed missile strikes, might have convinced President Biden and leaders like Macron and Starmer to approve long-range weapons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, this decision comes late. If we had received these weapons six months or a year ago, we might be in a better position now, with fewer losses in territory and lives. Delays have cost Ukraine dearly\u2014not just in human terms but financially, both for us and our partners supporting us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 A very detailed and insightful response. Let\u2019s talk about Trump. His son recently commented on the situation, criticizing Biden’s decisions and implying Trump could reinstate restrictions if he returns to the Oval Office. Is this plausible?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 It\u2019s possible. Biden likely lifted the ban partly to complicate Trump\u2019s potential return. Trump’s past rhetoric has suggested a willingness to end the war quickly, even at Ukraine\u2019s expense. A new administration could undo much of the current progress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump could push Ukraine into unfavorable negotiations with Russia or, conversely, strengthen our position. It depends on the initial dynamic between him and Putin. Either way, this war\u2019s trajectory will heavily depend on the approach of the next U.S. administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n